Postponement of EU BMR December 2019 deadline

Postponement of EU BMR December 2019 deadline

Will recent developments mark the end of LIBOR and EURIBOR by January 2022?

Possibly, a major change for the benchmark roadmap has been discussed during the first reading in parliament on 14 Jan 2019. Members of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) voted almost unanimously in favor to the amendment of article 51 “Transitional provisions” of the Benchmark Regulation (BMR). It is likely that the following paragraph will pass within the current legislation period:

„4a. An existing benchmark designated as critical by an implementing act adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 20 of this Regulation that does not meet the requirements to obtain authorisation in accordance with Article 34 of this Regulation by 1 January 2020 may, if its discontinuation would affect financial stability, be used until 31 December 2021.”

This Amendment will effectively extend the transitional phase for LIBOR, EURIBOR and EONIA by two years and has some major implications for the future benchmark landscape.

Short-term: reduction of operational risk in 2019

On 20 December 2018, the EU working group published a detailed roadmap of transition from EONIA to ESTER. This roadmap contains variables, many of which are still unknown as of today. The proposed amendment would allow market participants to use the benchmarks as they are published today even after 2019, taking some implementation pressure from market participants in the short run with regards to the ESTER-EONIA transition 2019. If the working group’s roadmap fails to materialise and the amendment passes, we would see harmonised transition schedules of the EU benchmarks and the US SOFR (Paced Transition Plan).

Mid-term: increased implementation pressure on the market

Another implication lies in the shift of power caused by the amendment in lights of article 34 BMR “authorisation and registration of an administrator”. The administrator of a benchmark must apply to the national competent authority (NCA) of the country where the administrator is located; in the case of the EONIA/EURIBOR administrator EMMI that would be Belgium (FSMA). While prior to the amendment the FCA / FSMA had no real option other than to approve Evolved-LIBOR and Hybrid-EURIBOR (as no successor benchmark will be in place by year-end) things are different now. The exceeded transition period gives those NCAs a real option to genuinely assess any benchmark methodology proposed by the administrators and the power to shape the future of Europe’s benchmark indices. This scenario will potentially accelerate the benchmark transition because it technically eliminates the option to use any adjusted form of LIBOR or EURIBOR for new business from 2022 onwards.


CapTech Group

LPA adds RegTech market leader Acarda to group

+++ Acarda, the specialist for integrated, regulatory and automated data management and reporting solutions will in future be operating under the umbrella of the LPA Group +++ This acquisition takes LPA into the growth segment of asset management and marks another milestone on its journey of international expansion +++ The acquisition broadens the LPA proposition combining innovative CapTech and RegTech automation solutions for financial sector organizations worldwide Frankfurt/Main, (08.09.2020)

CSA Management: One of the most underrated aspects of the IBOR transition?

The IBOR transition brings many changes to the capital markets sector. One of the critical challenges of transition management is the amendment of collateralization for OTC derivatives. PAI (and implicitly discounting) needs to be adapted for EUR and USD-cash collateral from EONIA and EFFR to the new Risk Free Rates (RFRs) €STR and SOFR. This has to be done by the end of 2021 [1] (EUR) and the end of 2020 [2] (USD), respectively. While the adjustment for cleared derivatives is managed centrally by the CCPs, counterparties of bilaterally collateralized derivative portfolios must amend the collateral agreements by themselves. This requires EONIA or EFFR based legacy CSAs to be negotiated and compensation payments between counterparties to be settled. Complexity is increased further as many market participants still have some non-standardized legacy CSAs with features such as embedded floors or thresholds in place. Strategic options (backloading, counterparty selection, novat

June 2020 Draft Amended PRIIPs RTS: What’s inside for Structured Products?

In a letter sent by the ESAs (the European Supervisory Authorities, i.e. EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) to the European Commission, the ESAs have included a draft amended PRIIPs RTS. As the letter points out...

Go back to all news

This website uses cookies to improve your experience.
Navigating in it, we understand you agree with our privacy policy.