Geistesblitz 02/19

Geistesblitz 02/19

Initial Situation

In the current interest rate environment, the demand for interest rate hedges for longer-term financings remains very high. Short to medium-term interest rate hedges, on the other hand, are relatively rare. Many variably financed companies do not use supplementary hedging instruments such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps or tailor-made solutions.

The main arguments put forward against interest rate hedging in the current environment are mostly a) the costs involved and b) the limited flexibility. With regard to the costs (e.g. the swap rate which is higher than the money market rate or the premium of the interest cap), it is also criticised that these arise irrespective of whether the interest rate hedge subsequently brings benefits. In terms of flexibility, an interest rate hedge would generate special benefits if it was only activated when the interest rate level (e.g. the swap rate for the remaining maturity) reaches a previously defined level.

With the “interest cap with contingent premium”, the current Geistesblitz represents an attractive opportunity for companies to reduce their interest rate risk of a rising 3-month Euribor without having to accept additional costs today.

Market Overview (February 15th 2019):

  • 3-month Euribor -0.3090% p.a.
  • 5-year Swap 0.1600% p.a.
  • 5-year Swap (with 0%-Floor) 0.4100% p.a.

The following chart shows the performance of the 3-month Euribor and the 5-year swap rate over the last 5 years.


Interest cap with contingent premium

Product description

Your customer has a financing requirement of EUR 5 million for the next 5 years. The interest payments are based on the 3-month Euribor. He wishes to take advantage of the still very low interest rate level and remain financed on a variable basis. In the medium term, your customer expects low capital market interest rates and assumes that they will not rise significantly until there is an imminent increase in ECB key interest rates.

In the initial situation, we continue to assume that the customer, either based on his own risk assessment or on the initiative of the financing bank, wishes to set an upper interest rate limit if the swap rate for the remaining maturity increased significantly and reached (or exceeded) a previously defined level.

For the hedge, the customer is prepared to pay an annualised premium. However, the premium should be avoided, especially if interest rates remain low. In an environment of rising interest rates, on the other hand, an increase in the interest burden is acceptable for him. These objectives are reflected in the “interest cap with contingent premium”.  

Indicative terms and conditions

  • Maturity 5 years from spot
  • Payments quarterly, act/360
  • Cap on 3-month Euribor 1.00% p.a.
  • Contingent premium 0.00% p.a., if reference rate below 0.80%, otherwise 1.00% p.a.
  • Reference rate year 1 5-year CMS-Satz i.a.*
  • Reference rate year 2 4-year CMS-Satz i.a.*
  • Reference rate year 3 3-year CMS-Satz i.a.*
  • Reference rate year 4 2-year CMS-Satz i.a.*
  • Reference rate year 5 1-year CMS-Satz i.a.* 

*: The reference rates are fixed at the end of each quarterly interest period (“i.a.” = „in arrears“)

Benefits and risks from a customer perspective

Benefits
  • Your customer locks-in an upper interest rate limit for his variable financing based on the 3-month Euribor.
  • Your customer continues to participate in low EUR interest rates. On the basis of current market data (current fixings), your customer reduces his interest burden by approx. 0.47% p.a. compared with the alternative 5-year swap rate.
  • Your customer will only pay a premium of 1.00% p.a. if the swap rate for the remaining maturity (approximately defined here as the reference interest rate) is fixed at or above 0.80%.
  • Based on current market data (forward interest rates), your customer would not have to pay the conditional premium in any of the interest periods.
Risks
  • The upper interest rate limit on the 3-month Euribor (excl. conditional premium) of 1.00% p.a. is 0.84% p.a. above the alternative swap rate.
  • If the reference interest rate is set at or above 0.80% at the end of the interest period, your customer must pay an interest cap premium of 1.00% p.a. for this interest period.
  • In the worst case, your customer pays a 3-month Euribor capped at the upper interest rate limit of 1.00% p.a. plus a conditional premium of 1.00% p.a. (in total 2.00% p.a.).

In a nutshell

The new Geistesblitz “interest cap with contingent premium” offers your customers the possibility of hedging against a significant rise in the 3-month Euribor. This is achieved by an interest cap that bears no premium in a restrained interest rate development. Whether based on their own risk assessment or on the initiative of the financing bank, an upper interest rate limit can thus be set, which remains free of charge depending on the interest rate development. Only if interest rates rise significantly – if the swap rate for the remaining maturity exceeds the predefined level – does a premium become due.

LPA

CapTech Group

EffCom AG merges with the LPA Group

About one year after the acquisition, the specialist for process automation, document management and securities solutions EffCom AG is being completely transferred as brand and legal entity to Lucht Probst Associates GmbH.

LPA adds RegTech market leader Acarda to group

+++ Acarda, the specialist for integrated, regulatory and automated data management and reporting solutions will in future be operating under the umbrella of the LPA Group +++ This acquisition takes LPA into the growth segment of asset management and marks another milestone on its journey of international expansion +++ The acquisition broadens the LPA proposition combining innovative CapTech and RegTech automation solutions for financial sector organizations worldwide Frankfurt/Main, (08.09.2020)

CSA Management: One of the most underrated aspects of the IBOR transition?

The IBOR transition brings many changes to the capital markets sector. One of the critical challenges of transition management is the amendment of collateralization for OTC derivatives. PAI (and implicitly discounting) needs to be adapted for EUR and USD-cash collateral from EONIA and EFFR to the new Risk Free Rates (RFRs) €STR and SOFR. This has to be done by the end of 2021 [1] (EUR) and the end of 2020 [2] (USD), respectively. While the adjustment for cleared derivatives is managed centrally by the CCPs, counterparties of bilaterally collateralized derivative portfolios must amend the collateral agreements by themselves. This requires EONIA or EFFR based legacy CSAs to be negotiated and compensation payments between counterparties to be settled. Complexity is increased further as many market participants still have some non-standardized legacy CSAs with features such as embedded floors or thresholds in place. Strategic options (backloading, counterparty selection, novat

Go back to all news

This website uses cookies to improve your experience.
Navigating in it, we understand you agree with our privacy policy.